Alec Nevala-Lee

Thoughts on art, creativity, and the writing life.

The kite-flyer’s calling

leave a comment »

George Garrett

[Writing] is certainly an irrational thing to do if you want either of the usual rewards of fame and riches. Of course, they’re there, but no self-respecting gambler would get into this game at all. Not even a wild one. Nick the Greek would faint at the odds against the writer. And here’s an interesting fact that a lot of people haven’t thought about. Maybe they have. I come slow to all these ideas. Have you ever stopped to think that for the first time, there have been no rational rewards for writing in the way that there were in the past? Much earlier, if you had a patron, that was why you wrote. Obviously, a different type of man is writing books today than was even in the nineteenth century, because when Dickens wrote there was a very definite cause-and-effect relationship. If he wrote the book and it was good and it was published, then he made a lot of money and improved his situation and was highly regarded. And if Shakespeare’s plays did well, as they did, and he was a stockholder in his company, it was a rational enterprise. Nowadays, it’s about as rational as saying, “What do you do for a living?” “Well, I’m a kite-flyer.” I mean, there’s not a great demand for kite-flyers around. There may be a few who draw a little money.

George Garrett,  in an interview with John Carr in Kite-Flying and Other Irrational Acts

Written by nevalalee

January 24, 2016 at 7:30 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: