Alec Nevala-Lee

Thoughts on art, creativity, and the writing life.

The lesson of salt

with one comment

Salt

Let’s talk about salt. As every home cook knows, salt is a miraculous substance: it’s cheap, plentiful, and so common that it’s easy to take for granted, but a few grains can make all the difference between a bland, unsatisfying meal and one that drives every flavor home. Harold McGee describes its virtues beautifully in his classic On Food and Cooking:

[Salt is] the only natural source of one of our basic tastes, and we therefore add it to most of our foods to fill out their flavor. Salt is also a taste enhancer and taste modifier: it strengthens the impression of aromas that accompany it, and it suppresses the sensation of bitterness. It’s one of the very few ingredients that we keep in pure form at the table, to be added to individual taste as we eat.

In other words, salt is both an essential seasoning in itself and a vehicle that sustains, enhances, and modifies other ingredients. And when professional cooks refer to a dish as “underseasoned”—at least based on my obsessive viewings of Top Chef—they’re referring less to the absence of other flavorings than to that one crucial component that delivers and balances the rest.

But when you add the salt can be as important as how much you put in. I was reminded of this over the weekend, when my wife and I attended a performance of Alton Brown Live at the Oriental Theater here in Chicago. The show itself was fun, if a little uneven—I enjoyed the performative food science but was less enthralled by Brown’s interminable musical numbers, which, with the host’s obvious delight at the chance to play the guitar in public, reminded me a lot of Conan’s live tour. But the part that stuck with me the most was a short lecture on the proper use of salt, which Brown believes is the single most critical skill that a chef can possess. Brown points out that because we’re warned against having too much sodium in our diet, we tend to underseason our food while cooking it, which is a mistake on at least two levels: if we’re eating too much salt, it’s because of fast food and processed snacks, not home cooking, and when an underseasoned dish is put in front of us, we’re inclined to shake on twice as much salt as we would have used otherwise. That is, a grain of salt in the kitchen is worth two at the table.

Alton Brown

And this reminded me, inevitably, of the writing process. Like cooking a meal, writing a story doesn’t happen all at once: it passes through many distinct steps, from conception to outlining to first draft to revision, and part of the reason we divide up the work in this way is to allow each stage to comment on and correct the one that came before. I’ll often end up with a rough draft that I know is lacking in certain respects, but I’ll push on anyway, reasoning that I can fix things in the rewrite. In itself, this isn’t a bad approach, both because it allows me to finish what I start and because it gives me that residue of unanswered questions that you need at each turn. At other times, I’ll go back to reread a manuscript and find that it’s missing something important: there isn’t enough action in one sequence of chapters, say, or another section leaves certain plot points or character relationships unclear. What I’ll usually do then is figure out what I need to add; insert a new line, paragraph, or scene to clarify or fill out the omission; and then revise the whole thing until any seams are invisible. This is a natural part of the writing process, which resembles an endless feedback loop, with each read informing every rewrite until you’re done.

Yet I keep coming back to the lesson of salt. Just as salting a dish to correct a lack of flavor at the table only haphazardly addresses problems that should have been solved in the kitchen, going back over a story to patch over an implausible moment or poorly conceived character only disguises a flaw that should have been fixed much earlier. This isn’t to say that every aspect of a story needs to be fully worked out before you begin writing—in fact, I gave the opposite advice just last week. What it does mean, however, is that we need to proceed, like good chefs, from basic principles, and do as much of our work as possible as we prepare the dish for the first time. Making sure that a story arises from a series of logical actions by the protagonist in pursuit of a solution to a problem, for instance, is the equivalent of using good ingredients and combining them in the right proportions, and any interest, color, or atmosphere should arise from the narrative itself, rather than being imposed after the fact. Allowing the story to grow in this way requires close attention at every stage, which is why good chefs taste the dish throughout the process. It takes practice and patience, and even the best cooks sometimes end up with a disaster. But when you’re done, if you’ve prepared it all properly, you’ll end up with a story that is just salty enough.

Written by nevalalee

February 11, 2014 at 9:09 am

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Nice work!!! Well done. Checkout goldenmorals and see the little that I do. http://www.goldenmorals.wordpress.com

    goldenmorals

    February 11, 2014 at 12:14 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: