Alec Nevala-Lee

Thoughts on art, creativity, and the writing life.

Closing thoughts on “Kawataro”

with 5 comments

Looking back at “Kawataro,” I’m impressed by how quickly it all came together. Although the initial idea occurred to me somewhat earlier, I didn’t start researching it in earnest until April 12 of last year, which was a Monday. I spent the next few days reading and brainstorming, finished an outline on Friday, and began writing the story the following week. The first draft was finished by April 23, and by April 26—exactly one year ago—I had a revised version that changed very little before its final publication. All in all, then, the research, writing, and revision of “Kawataro” took about two weeks, followed by a period of almost a year before it saw the light of day, which is pretty typical of the magazine publication cycle. (“The Boneless One,” which is coming out this fall, will have taken almost three and a half years from conception to publication.)

Once I had the initial version, the revision of “Kawataro” was fairly painless. While some stories continue to evolve dramatically until the final draft—”The Boneless One,” for instance, has an entirely different ending from the version that I originally sent to Analog—the revision of “Kawataro” was just a matter of tightening the story and polishing the prose, or at least as much as could be done in three or four days. The first, incredibly messy draft was 13,300 words long, which I cut down to 10,700 very quickly, thus obeying Stephen King’s dictum by editing the first version by almost 20%. In retrospect, I wish I’d had another couple of days to polish the draft, but by that point I had to get back to work on The Icon Thief, so I had no choice but to send the story out as it was.

The first magazine to see “Kawataro” was Fantasy & Science Fiction, which rejected it. (I still haven’t been published there.) I honestly can’t remember why they turned it down, and while I probably have the rejection slip lying around here somewhere, it’s currently buried under countless other piles of junk. Analog was the next stop. (I would have sent it there first, but they already had another story of mine under consideration, and they don’t like it when you submit more than one story at a time.) I sent the manuscript off on July 17, and my first indication that they wanted to take it was three months later, when managing editor Trevor Quachri emailed to ask for a Word file of the story. At first, I thought that the acceptance letter had been lost in the mail, but it turns out that Stanley Schmidt liked it enough to accept it without corrections. Which is great—it’s the first and only time Analog has accepted a story of mine without changes—although to this day I’m not entirely sure what Stan thinks of it.

And what do I think of “Kawataro” today? Reading it over again, I couldn’t help but notice places where I would have revised the story if I’d had more time—some of the transitions between scenes, for instance, aren’t great—but all in all, I’m pleased by it. The writing is generally good, the setting is spooky and atmospheric, and overall, it’s a tight, compelling story. (My sister-in-law paid me the ultimate compliment by saying that she found it unsettling enough that she had to remind herself that it was only a story I’d written—which is basically the nicest thing a writer can hear.) And the various elements come together in a way that seems seamless, at least to my eyes. After enough time has passed, a story begins to assume a life of its own, until even the author has trouble remembering where all the pieces came from. As a result, I’ve really enjoyed reconstructing the process over the past few days, and hope that you’ve found it interesting as well.

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I’m finding it ALL very interesting.

    The thoughts and process of a writer.

    The inner world of the writer in question.

    The mechanisms of getting published (or not)… ‘

    It’s great!!!

    I wonder if you were to hire an editor to help you get to the out of reach places…if that is in fact your goal.

    They might have an internal metronome of what gets published that might be intuitive to them.

    Arthur

    April 26, 2011 at 1:53 pm

  2. Glad you’re enjoying it!

    As for other magazines (along with F&SF, I’d love to be published in Asimov’s), it’s really just a question of persistence. The only problem is that I have less time for short fiction these days than I’d like. In any case, though, I’m glad to be a regular contributor to Analog.

    nevalalee

    April 26, 2011 at 2:02 pm

  3. “it’s really just a question of persistence”

    But what if it is something so ridiculously unobvious. “We don’t do stories about young boys…stories that look and sound like X-files are racist…” (ha-ha)

    You know what I mean.

    I’m SURE Analog is happy to have you.

    Arthur

    April 26, 2011 at 3:12 pm

  4. some of the transitions between scenes, for instance, aren’t great

    I guess you’re saying that you should have taken more cues from Battlefield Earth?

    Noah Snyder

    April 29, 2011 at 10:16 am

  5. @Noah: That’s still my favorite video box blurb of all time. Alas, my copy didn’t survive the move to Chicago.

    nevalalee

    April 29, 2011 at 10:49 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: